International
Guidance.

Within the INTOSAI Working Group on Evaluation of Public Policies and Programs (WGEPPP), thirteen Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs) are collaborating on the development of guidance on multidimensional poverty audits. The initiative brings together the experience, audits, and knowledge of participating SAIs from different regions of the world. As project leader, the Federal Court of Accounts of Brazil (TCU) coordinates the methodological structuring and technical consolidation of the contributions developed collectively.

The guidance seeks to address a central question: how can Supreme Audit Institutions use multidimensional poverty evidence to select audit subjects, evaluate public policies, develop recommendations with an impact, and create greater value for society? To this end, the document presents key concepts related to multidimensional poverty audits, discusses SAIs' strategic planning, proposes approaches to audit planning and execution, and explores ways to assess outcomes, impact, and public value creation.

The guidance resulting from this work can be applied to audits from various perspectives. Countries with no prior experience in poverty audits will receive support in planning their first multidimensional poverty audits, while those with greater experience can improve their long-term strategic planning.

The guidance can also be useful to state and municipal audit institutions with varying levels of experience.

Comunidade com ausência de saneamento
Pessoa em situação de vulnerabilidade
Trabalho de coleta e reciclagem
Habitações precárias
Criança em atividade escolar

01

SAIs participating in the development of the Guidance:

02

How Does Adopting Guidance Contribute to Government Oversight?

Multiplier effect

The proposed guidance was developed for use by different Supreme Audit Institutions (SAIs), regardless of each country's specific context. Although each setting requires adaptations, adopting common principles increases the potential for comparing audits and identifying new ways of working.

As more institutions adopt this approach, their capacity to share experiences, improve audit methods, and identify practices that can contribute to addressing poverty more effectively also grows. This creates a multiplier effect: the knowledge generated by one institution can support the work of many others.

This, in turn, establishes an international network for sharing knowledge on multidimensional poverty audits, fostering cooperation among oversight institutions and the continuous improvement of the methodologies they use.

People see the results when public policies begin to respond more effectively to people's actual needs, rather than merely to traditional indicators.

For example, a housing program is no longer evaluated solely based on the number of homes delivered; it also considers families' access to sanitation, drinking water, and nearby healthcare facilities.

Families may not see the index, but they can see better decisions being made.

03

Next steps

What lies ahead

2026

Release of the Guidance on multidimensional poverty audit jointly with the other SAIs.

2027

Pilot audits to be conducted by other countries' SAIs using the guide as a supporting resource.
Feedback on the guidance based on the pilot audits at the 2027 WGEPPP Meeting.